🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a thought leader? Do numerous respondents applauding your insights on expanding your business? Are headhunters making contact to discuss opportunities?

If not, the reason could be that you're not male.

The Test: Modifying Profile Gender to achieve Better Visibility

Dozens of female professionals participated in a collective professional network test recently after viral posts suggested that switching their profile gender to "man" boosted their network presence.

Other testers rewrote their professional summaries to incorporate what they called "masculine-oriented" language - adding results-driven professional jargon like "propel", "transform" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their exposure similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The improved metrics has led some to speculate whether a built-in gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm prioritizes male users who employ professional networking terminology.

Like most major networking sites, LinkedIn utilizes a computerized system to determine which content are shown to which members - promoting some while reducing others.

Platform Response

Through a company announcement, LinkedIn recognized the trend but stated it does not consider "personal characteristics" when determining post visibility. Rather, the company mentioned that "numerous factors" influence how posts perform.

Modifying profile gender in your settings does not influence how your content appears in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who changed her gender identifiers to "he/him" and her profile name to "a masculine version", reported extraordinary results.

"The statistics I'm seeing show a 1,600% increase in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in content views," she noted.

Another professional, a marketing expert, started testing after noticing her reach decline significantly.

The Process

• Initially, she changed her profile gender to "male"
• Subsequently, she used AI tools to rephrase her professional summary using "male-coded" wording
• Lastly, she recycled old posts with similar "agentic" language

The result was immediate: a 415% increase in reach within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the positive results, Cornish voiced unhappiness with the method.

"Previously, my content were softer - concise and clever, but also warm and human," she stated. "Now, the masculine version was assertive and self-assured - similar to a white male being overly confident."

She abandoned the test after seven days, saying "Every day I persisted, and outcomes improved, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Some testers experienced positive outcomes. One writer who modified both her gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "white" described a decrease in visibility and engagement.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's extremely difficult to comprehend how it functions in specific cases or why," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These tests occur alongside continuing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive position as both a business platform and community site.

Platform modifications in the past few months have reportedly resulted in female creators experiencing significantly reduced visibility, resulting in unofficial tests where the same posts by male and female users received vastly different reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the platform uses AI systems to categorize and spread posts based on various elements, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company claims it regularly evaluates its systems, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in some users' reach might originate from higher volume due to additional posts on the platform.

Changing Landscape

As one participant observed, "masculine-oriented language" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "That's changing. It's becoming increasingly aggressive and less controlled."